Parents may agree on a parenting schedule yet disagree about an important decision affecting their child. One parent may prefer a different school, question a recommended treatment, or believe a particular educational service is necessary. The disagreement can become especially difficult when both parents feel they are acting in the child’s best interests.

In Tennessee, the starting point is often the parenting plan. A plan may address decision-making authority separately from where the child lives and how parenting time is divided.

A parenting plan may assign responsibility for major decisions involving education and non-emergency healthcare to one parent or require the parents to make those decisions jointly.

That distinction matters. Being designated the primary residential parent does not automatically answer every question about decision-making authority. The actual language of the order should be reviewed rather than relying on assumptions about custody.

Tennessee court decisions illustrate that education and non-emergency healthcare authority can be assigned separately and may be modified when supported by the facts and the child’s best interests.

School decisions may involve location, transportation, academic support, extracurricular opportunities, or a child’s particular needs. Healthcare disagreements may involve treatment recommendations, specialists, counseling, medication, or ongoing care.

Parents may also differ about the information they have received. One parent may have spoken with a teacher or provider while the other has not. Before the disagreement can be understood, it may be necessary to clarify the recommendation, the available alternatives, and the relevant parenting-plan provisions.

A disagreement over routine scheduling is not necessarily the same as a disagreement over a major decision. Emergency care may also raise different questions from planned, non-emergency treatment.

The parenting plan may include a process for resolving disagreements, such as mediation. If an agreement is not possible, legal guidance may help determine whether court involvement is appropriate.

An attorney can review the order, identify who has decision-making authority, and explain the options for addressing the dispute. In some cases, the issue concerns enforcing an existing provision. In others, the question may be whether the plan should be changed.

The focus should remain on the child’s needs rather than on which parent wins the disagreement. Relevant school records, provider recommendations, and communications may help explain why the issue matters.

If you are facing a disagreement over your child’s education or healthcare in Lebanon or Wilson County, contact Hagar & Phillips at 615-784-4588 to schedule a confidential consultation. Our family law team can review your parenting plan and discuss the available options.

This article is for general informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

‍

‍